Temporary Moderator Vote

Zez wrote:No.

Schnickelfritz wrote:

Zez wrote:No.

You're no fun anymore.

Knucklesownsyou280 wrote:You don't need to appoint any temporary staff. I mean, if it was for longer than a few months, then fine, however, the state of the forums would show that the current number of staff on duty is plenty enough to handle the forum.

*ShiningStar* wrote:

Knucklesownsyou280 wrote:You don't need to appoint any temporary staff. I mean, if it was for longer than a few months, then fine, however, the state of the forums would show that the current number of staff on duty is plenty enough to handle the forum.

That's true. However, at the time this thread was made, we didn't know how long Zezima's isolation period would take and we didn't know where sykog was either (he didn't log in for a while. But he came back soon so that's cool).

So we decided the hold a Temporary Leader poll and afterwards, we had a Temp Admin poll to see which mod would replace the Admin who would be the Temp Leader, and Temp Mod thread for a replacement for the promoted Mod.

Knucklesownsyou280 wrote:

*ShiningStar* wrote:
That's true. However, at the time this thread was made, we didn't know how long Zezima's isolation period would take and we didn't know where sykog was either (he didn't log in for a while. But he came back soon so that's cool).

So we decided the hold a Temporary Leader poll and afterwards, we had a Temp Admin poll to see which mod would replace the Admin who would be the Temp Leader, and Temp Mod thread for a replacement for the promoted Mod.

Yeah I understand, but even in that event I'm pretty sure TFF could handle the forum by himself, with help from the moderation staff, without all those unecessary polls and such. If anything, a new mod would be enough, but even then, I'd say that's only in a state of emergency.