The ancient lands.
 |  |  |  |
26
226Aediliel Mithraisyr wrote:I personally disagree with that decision, as women who have not prepared for childbirth should have the decision to opt out, and it is the State's responsibility to support that decision. I acknowledge that lack of use of contraception may have led to unwanted childbirths (resulting in abortions) but women who wish to have abortions should feel confident that the Government will support their decision.
4Aediliel Mithraisyr wrote:I personally disagree with that decision, as women who have not prepared for childbirth should have the decision to opt out, and it is the State's responsibility to support that decision. I acknowledge that lack of use of contraception may have led to unwanted childbirths (resulting in abortions) but women who wish to have abortions should feel confident that the Government will support their decision.
0Too longMario94 wrote:Aediliel Mithraisyr wrote:I personally disagree with that decision, as women who have not prepared for childbirth should have the decision to opt out, and it is the State's responsibility to support that decision. I acknowledge that lack of use of contraception may have led to unwanted childbirths (resulting in abortions) but women who wish to have abortions should feel confident that the Government will support their decision.
No. I agree with Congress's decision. If someone wants to kill their unborn child and they find a doctor to do it, they can spend their own money. First off, abortion is far too controversial to be pumping money into. Second, have you forgotten there is the choice of adoption? Third, there are people out there who really need medical treatment. These women just want to not have to deal with caring for a child. Abortion is a selfish sin. Yes, I said abortion is a sin. It caters to what the individual wants. I say if a woman wants to abort an unborn child so badly, then maybe they shouldn't get it. Maybe they should learn the responsibility of caring for another human being. Maybe they should learn the consequences of their actions. I understand rape is an exception, but even then, abortion is no less wrong.
The State doesn't have any responsibility to let women get an abortion. You think it's all black and white over here about abortion just because it's that way in the UK? You're dead wrong. Even today, even after the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973, it's still an issue in America. There have been over 50 million babies aborted since the Supreme Court decision, and even then, it hasn't been settled. The government really only cares when it puts money in their pockets, and they likely made the right choice for the wrong reason. They probably only eliminated public funding for abortion clinics because it would cut into their paycheck. The State feels no responsibility to serve the American people anymore. We are votes to them, and they forget about us as soon as they get their seat. So pro- or anti-abortion, it doesn't matter to Congress.
26wrote:Too longMario94 wrote:Aediliel Mithraisyr wrote:I personally disagree with that decision, as women who have not prepared for childbirth should have the decision to opt out, and it is the State's responsibility to support that decision. I acknowledge that lack of use of contraception may have led to unwanted childbirths (resulting in abortions) but women who wish to have abortions should feel confident that the Government will support their decision.
No. I agree with Congress's decision. If someone wants to kill their unborn child and they find a doctor to do it, they can spend their own money. First off, abortion is far too controversial to be pumping money into. Second, have you forgotten there is the choice of adoption? Third, there are people out there who really need medical treatment. These women just want to not have to deal with caring for a child. Abortion is a selfish sin. Yes, I said abortion is a sin. It caters to what the individual wants. I say if a woman wants to abort an unborn child so badly, then maybe they shouldn't get it. Maybe they should learn the responsibility of caring for another human being. Maybe they should learn the consequences of their actions. I understand rape is an exception, but even then, abortion is no less wrong.
The State doesn't have any responsibility to let women get an abortion. You think it's all black and white over here about abortion just because it's that way in the UK? You're dead wrong. Even today, even after the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973, it's still an issue in America. There have been over 50 million babies aborted since the Supreme Court decision, and even then, it hasn't been settled. The government really only cares when it puts money in their pockets, and they likely made the right choice for the wrong reason. They probably only eliminated public funding for abortion clinics because it would cut into their paycheck. The State feels no responsibility to serve the American people anymore. We are votes to them, and they forget about us as soon as they get their seat. So pro- or anti-abortion, it doesn't matter to Congress.
Didn't read
0Theres this wonderful thing called rapeSoviet Soldier wrote:wrote:Too longMario94 wrote:Aediliel Mithraisyr wrote:I personally disagree with that decision, as women who have not prepared for childbirth should have the decision to opt out, and it is the State's responsibility to support that decision. I acknowledge that lack of use of contraception may have led to unwanted childbirths (resulting in abortions) but women who wish to have abortions should feel confident that the Government will support their decision.
No. I agree with Congress's decision. If someone wants to kill their unborn child and they find a doctor to do it, they can spend their own money. First off, abortion is far too controversial to be pumping money into. Second, have you forgotten there is the choice of adoption? Third, there are people out there who really need medical treatment. These women just want to not have to deal with caring for a child. Abortion is a selfish sin. Yes, I said abortion is a sin. It caters to what the individual wants. I say if a woman wants to abort an unborn child so badly, then maybe they shouldn't get it. Maybe they should learn the responsibility of caring for another human being. Maybe they should learn the consequences of their actions. I understand rape is an exception, but even then, abortion is no less wrong.
The State doesn't have any responsibility to let women get an abortion. You think it's all black and white over here about abortion just because it's that way in the UK? You're dead wrong. Even today, even after the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973, it's still an issue in America. There have been over 50 million babies aborted since the Supreme Court decision, and even then, it hasn't been settled. The government really only cares when it puts money in their pockets, and they likely made the right choice for the wrong reason. They probably only eliminated public funding for abortion clinics because it would cut into their paycheck. The State feels no responsibility to serve the American people anymore. We are votes to them, and they forget about us as soon as they get their seat. So pro- or anti-abortion, it doesn't matter to Congress.
Didn't read
I'll sum it up, don't get a baby if you don't want one which is as simple as don't have sex
26wrote:Theres this wonderful thing called rapeSoviet Soldier wrote:wrote:Too longMario94 wrote:
No. I agree with Congress's decision. If someone wants to kill their unborn child and they find a doctor to do it, they can spend their own money. First off, abortion is far too controversial to be pumping money into. Second, have you forgotten there is the choice of adoption? Third, there are people out there who really need medical treatment. These women just want to not have to deal with caring for a child. Abortion is a selfish sin. Yes, I said abortion is a sin. It caters to what the individual wants. I say if a woman wants to abort an unborn child so badly, then maybe they shouldn't get it. Maybe they should learn the responsibility of caring for another human being. Maybe they should learn the consequences of their actions. I understand rape is an exception, but even then, abortion is no less wrong.
The State doesn't have any responsibility to let women get an abortion. You think it's all black and white over here about abortion just because it's that way in the UK? You're dead wrong. Even today, even after the Roe v. Wade decision in 1973, it's still an issue in America. There have been over 50 million babies aborted since the Supreme Court decision, and even then, it hasn't been settled. The government really only cares when it puts money in their pockets, and they likely made the right choice for the wrong reason. They probably only eliminated public funding for abortion clinics because it would cut into their paycheck. The State feels no responsibility to serve the American people anymore. We are votes to them, and they forget about us as soon as they get their seat. So pro- or anti-abortion, it doesn't matter to Congress.
Didn't read
I'll sum it up, don't get a baby if you don't want one which is as simple as don't have sex
24Soviet Soldier wrote:information on the health care bill
Soviet Soldier wrote:yep, and now I don't care if it passes or not.
Soviet Soldier wrote:to me it's this:
if you don't want kids don't have sex, it's pretty simple...
wrote:Too long.
Didn't read.
Soviet Soldier wrote:I'll sum it up, don't get a baby if you don't want one which is as simple as don't have sex.
wrote:There's this wonderful thing called rape.
Soviet Soldier wrote:that's why they invented adoption.
34
2234Yet another point proving that you shouldn't be a mod.... According to example user #9 in the English clause, which can be found here, https://sonicommunity.forumotion.com/community-rules-f10/english-clause-t4087.htm, you don't deserve to be a mod. Not to mention the large line of improper grammar, plus the overusage of capital letters. You just broke 3 Community rules with one post. What a great mod you are, and a great role model for little LSB's out there. Dang, Zezzy, you sure know how to pick 'em.Erazor wrote:FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFALSKFHAD:SLKFJHBSADHYBNEORSLRVHBLKJSRHALKBSERBHVALWKHBALKRHEVABKSLUYAHBOSIRKIASDGASJKHD
What the hell? God damn conservatives.
22Oh no. You don't like that I'm a mod. I think I'll cry myself to sleep tonight.Schnickelfritz wrote:Yet another point proving that you shouldn't be a mod.... According to example user #9 in the English clause, which can be found here, https://sonicommunity.forumotion.com/community-rules-f10/english-clause-t4087.htm, you don't deserve to be a mod. Not to mention the large line of improper grammar, plus the overusage of capital letters. You just broke 3 Community rules with one post. What a great mod you are, and a great role model for little LSB's out there. Dang, Zezzy, you sure know how to pick 'em.Erazor wrote:FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFALSKFHAD:SLKFJHBSADHYBNEORSLRVHBLKJSRHALKBSERBHVALWKHBALKRHEVABKSLUYAHBOSIRKIASDGASJKHD
What the hell? God damn conservatives.
7634You have no idea how much I would enjoy that.Erazor wrote:Oh no. You don't like that I'm a mod. I think I'll cry myself to sleep tonight.Schnickelfritz wrote:Yet another point proving that you shouldn't be a mod.... According to example user #9 in the English clause, which can be found here, https://sonicommunity.forumotion.com/community-rules-f10/english-clause-t4087.htm, you don't deserve to be a mod. Not to mention the large line of improper grammar, plus the overusage of capital letters. You just broke 3 Community rules with one post. What a great mod you are, and a great role model for little LSB's out there. Dang, Zezzy, you sure know how to pick 'em.Erazor wrote:FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFALSKFHAD:SLKFJHBSADHYBNEORSLRVHBLKJSRHALKBSERBHVALWKHBALKRHEVABKSLUYAHBOSIRKIASDGASJKHD
What the hell? God damn conservatives.
76
12Schnickelfritz wrote:You have no idea how much I would enjoy that.Erazor wrote:Oh no. You don't like that I'm a mod. I think I'll cry myself to sleep tonight.Schnickelfritz wrote:Yet another point proving that you shouldn't be a mod.... According to example user #9 in the English clause, which can be found here, https://sonicommunity.forumotion.com/community-rules-f10/english-clause-t4087.htm, you don't deserve to be a mod. Not to mention the large line of improper grammar, plus the overusage of capital letters. You just broke 3 Community rules with one post. What a great mod you are, and a great role model for little LSB's out there. Dang, Zezzy, you sure know how to pick 'em.Erazor wrote:FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFALSKFHAD:SLKFJHBSADHYBNEORSLRVHBLKJSRHALKBSERBHVALWKHBALKRHEVABKSLUYAHBOSIRKIASDGASJKHD
What the hell? God damn conservatives.
204The Freedom Fighter wrote:Adoption is all and good, but really, come on, growing a baby, especially if you're alone, is not fun, I'm thinking. Yes, perhaps abortion is a sin, but really, it is our right to make sins, and as such, why should we stop them from it? People are allowed to sin plenty of times, and we usually won't hold it against them. If pregnancy wasn't such a process, I might be more inclined to agree to it, but as it is, I'm not going to fight a woman's decision, because I'd assume she must have already thought it through, after all.
2034
076I never said otherwise.Mario94 wrote:First off, just because it is a right to sin doesn't make it all right to sin.
Just because they don't have to doesn't mean they don't.Mario94 wrote:Second, your statement about a woman thinking abortion through is off. When a woman/teen girl is put into such a position, they usually don't have to think hard about it. More often than not, as soon as she discovers she's pregnant from that one-night stand, she goes out of her way to find the nearest abortion clinic.
Yes, but not always can pregnancy be prevented, nor under one's control, so it isn't fair, perhaps not even safe, to force one to be pregnant. After all, you don't want to pay for their operations, so why should they have to pay for the actions of others?Mario94 wrote:Third, your statements on pregnancy not being "fun" and being "such a process" is exactly what women who want abortions think. They want the baby gone because they don't want to go through pregnancy or parenthood. As I said before, abortion is a selfish act that only caters to a woman's desire to eliminate something she sees as a complication that she doesn't want to deal with. Health teachers and parents across America teach safe sex to teenagers because they figure, "We may as well teach them safe sex since they're gonna do it no matter what we tell them." Pregnancy may be prevented, but if anyone thinks that a condom is gonna keep them from suffering the consequences, they need to be smacked. If a woman thinks that a baby is a pest not welcome in her body, she needs to consider she could get one that won't ever go away: an STD.
26
35Soviet Soldier wrote:The Bill was signed by El Presidente today
just thought I'd share it....
|
|
|
