Sonic Adventure 1 is better.
Super Mario 64 is cool, but not as cool.
Super Mario 64 is cool, but not as cool.
+13
LockerKnot
Sweet_Savannah_Charmy
Schnickelfritz
Plix
Mighty
sykog
Chaos_Overlord
SonicFanPS2
TheShadowWalker
Erazor
Superdoodleman
Jmh
BlasterForceXtreme
17 posters
Sonic Adventure 1 vs. Super Mario 64
Poll
What better?
- [ 11 ]
[61%]
- [ 6 ]
- [33%]
- [ 1 ]
- [6%]
- [ 0 ]
- [0%]
Total Votes: 18
BlasterForceXtreme
- :
0
Age: : 33
Posts: : 258
Jmh
:67
Age: : 29
Posts: : 7103
I personally prefer Super Mario 64.
Superdoodleman
:0
Posts: : 859
Mario 64 DS isn't on there.
BlasterForceXtreme- : 0
Age: : 33
Posts: : 258
wrote:Mario 64 DS isn't on there.
If Mario 64 DS would be on, then by that logic, so should the inferior version of SA1, SADX. So no.
Also the ports can count in their original formats here.
Erazor
:22
Posts: : 2153
Sonic Adventure. In terms of overall content, they're about even, but Sonic Adventure has the advantages of more characters, more variety, better music, better graphics, better story, and significantly more voice acting.
TheShadowWalker
:3
Age: : 29
Posts: : 2366
Sonic Adventure.
I actually beat it. SM64 is great and all, but I got sick of it after awhile.
Sonic, I never will get sick of.
I actually beat it. SM64 is great and all, but I got sick of it after awhile.
Sonic, I never will get sick of.
BlasterForceXtreme- : 0
Age: : 33
Posts: : 258
And Sonic Adventure 1 is the easier game to pick up and play. Super Mario 64 is overly complex for that.
Erazor
:22
Posts: : 2153
Let's not forget the reason why half of the N64's games are difficult to pick up and play.BlasterForceXtreme wrote:And Sonic Adventure 1 is the easier game to pick up and play. Super Mario 64 is overly complex for that.
BlasterForceXtreme- : 0
Age: : 33
Posts: : 258
Actually the controller was pretty badass.
Erazor
:22
Posts: : 2153
In appearance, yes. But, It really only worked well with the seriously deformed. I swear to god, half of my collection is almost unplayable.BlasterForceXtreme wrote:Actually the controller was pretty badass.
BlasterForceXtreme- : 0
Age: : 33
Posts: : 258
Well, the controller functions most like other controllers, they just placed the Joystick in a different position. But it goes out pretty cool if you ask me.
Superdoodleman
:0
Posts: : 859
FINALLYBlasterForceXtreme wrote:Well, the controller functions most like other controllers, they just placed the Joystick in a different position. But it goes out pretty cool if you ask me.
Someone who actually LIKED that controller.
I think it was made mainly for people with big hands.
I'm voting for Mario 64. Mainly cause 64 DS isn't on there. 64 DS has 3 times the content of 64 and SA combined.
BlasterForceXtreme- : 0
Age: : 33
Posts: : 258
Sonic Adventure 1 has more content.
Superdoodleman
:0
Posts: : 859
Eh. 64 DS Adds 3 new characters and 30 new stars. As well as Collectible rabbits, Enhanced graphics and minigames.BlasterForceXtreme wrote:Sonic Adventure 1 has more content.
BlasterForceXtreme- : 0
Age: : 33
Posts: : 258
Sonic Adventure 1 had 7 playable characters, better graphics, VMU features, Internet features, Chao Gardens, Hubworlds, and played better.
Superdoodleman
:0
Posts: : 859
It had 6 playable characters and Super Sonic. The graphics were supirior to original's, But not 64 DS, No clue wht VMU is, Don't really care about internet or Chao, Mario had a hub worl and much less linear levels, And the last one is debatable.BlasterForceXtreme wrote:Sonic Adventure 1 had 7 playable characters, better graphics, VMU features, Internet features, Chao Gardens, Hubworlds, and played better.
BlasterForceXtreme- : 0
Age: : 33
Posts: : 258
The graphics of the original SA1 are superior to SADX.
And if you don't know what a VMU is, then leave.
And if you don't know what a VMU is, then leave.
SonicFanPS2
:12
Age: : 71
Posts: : 2090
Don't forget the fact that DX had some Gamegear games in there too, if we're also talking about the ports.
Last edited by SonicFanPS2 on March 12th 2010, 5:32 pm; edited 1 time in total
BlasterForceXtreme- : 0
Age: : 33
Posts: : 258
No, those were GameGear games. And those don't really count, because those are DIFFERENT games.
SonicFanPS2
:12
Age: : 71
Posts: : 2090
BlasterForceXtreme wrote:No, those were GameGear games. And those don't really count, because those are DIFFERENT games.
Gamegear games, I apologize. And don't they, since they're basically the same content + new stuff?
Plus, Sonic Adventure, since it featured a hub world, had about 9-10 stages that were able to be changed 6 times for 6 characters! I admit, Big's stages were horrible. But he himself wasn't too bad.
However, Super Mario 64's world didn't change at all with their worlds. They instead kept changing the missions constantly, like in Sunshine. And you had to get so many stars to actually beat the final boss. That wasn't really fun. A bit too repetitive, to be honest. Though, this is for the DS version, seeing as I never played the 64 version.
I like Galaxy though. That was awesome. I also agree that the controller for the 64 was extremely fun to play.
Last edited by SonicFanPS2 on March 12th 2010, 7:44 pm; edited 1 time in total
Chaos_Overlord
:11
Age: : 32
Posts: : 1633
As much as I like Adventure 1, I personally prefered SM64. That game sucked me in teh instant I played it.
BlasterForceXtreme- : 0
Age: : 33
Posts: : 258
Big The Cat was awesome.
SonicFanPS2
:12
Age: : 71
Posts: : 2090
BlasterForceXtreme wrote:Big The Cat was awesome.
I loved swimming in the water while using him. Eh, he was actually pretty fun. His stages weren't too bad.
sykog
:29
Age: : 30
Posts: : 8839
No, it was terrible. I don't have 3 hands.BlasterForceXtreme wrote:Actually the controller was pretty badass.
Superdoodleman
:0
Posts: : 859
Which is why you don't ned to use the far left one but in a couple of games.sykog77 wrote:No, it was terrible. I don't have 3 hands.BlasterForceXtreme wrote:Actually the controller was pretty badass.
|
|
|
