Like if they have 1 post, they're: N00b (Under their username)
If they have 789 posts: Grand Sage
er, whatever. We'll focus on the names, if it's decided to be passed by congress.
So, should we have a system like that?
Sonic The Armadillo wrote:I don't want one, I don't want my name to say
Sonic the Armadillo
Rank: something
Sonic Community Sidekick.
Feels crowded
Why not?Light Dash wrote:Only one rank can be established at one time.
And if we do it by hundreds, it shouldn't double each time.
Doubling is fine with me.Erazor wrote:Why not?Light Dash wrote:Only one rank can be established at one time.
And if we do it by hundreds, it shouldn't double each time.
Exactly. It should get more difficult to increase rank as you progress. Has thou not played any video games?sykog77 wrote:Doubling is fine with me.Erazor wrote:Why not?Light Dash wrote:Only one rank can be established at one time.
And if we do it by hundreds, it shouldn't double each time.
Perhaps begin with doubling and then tripling. After all, it shouldn't get any easier to ascend through the ranks.Kriegsmarine wrote:how would you know about video games if you feel asleep all the time!
but in all serious though I think tripling is the way to go
YES!!!! INGENIIOUS!!!!! : ):The Freedom Fighter wrote:1-50: You're Too New!
51-100: Come on, Post it Up!
100-200: Too easy, piece of cake!
200-350: Huh, no problem.
350-500: That was pretty rough.
500-750: That was tight!
750-1000: I'm the coolest!
I would much rather have names then sayings.The Freedom Fighter wrote:1-50: You're Too New!
51-100: Come on, Post it Up!
100-200: Too easy, piece of cake!
200-350: Huh, no problem.
350-500: That was pretty rough.
500-750: That was tight!
750-1000: I'm the coolest!
That sounds so dickishThe Freedom Fighter wrote:1-50: You're Too New!
51-100: Come on, Post it Up!
100-200: Too easy, piece of cake!
200-350: Huh, no problem.
350-500: That was pretty rough.
500-750: That was tight!
750-1000: I'm the coolest!